A list of ten ways we are decadent and a (speculative) theory about why it might not matter

Decadence here means sameness, complacency or boredom, as recently discussed by Ross Douthat and Peter Thiel.

  1. Technological stagnation. “Go into a room and subtract off all the screens. How do you then know you’re not in 1973?”
  2. Falling birth rates. “Across almost all of the OECD, current fertility rates are well below those needed for population replacement… by 1995 most had rates well below replacement level.”
  3. More movie remakes. “The 2000s saw the most remakes of any decade, with an average of 19 a year. In 2005, a record-breaking 33 remakes made it to the big screen.” Also this: “In 2014, there were more hugely successful movies based on young adult books than ever before.”
  4. Reverse Flynn effect. “Studies in Denmark, Norway and the United Kingdom have shown that the Flynn effect has not only ended, but that there is actually a decrease in the average IQ scores.”
  5. Productivity has stalled. “Since 2010, annual growth in labour productivity has slowed to 0.9%, about half the rate recorded in the 2000-2005 pre-crisis period.”
  6. Economic growth underperformance since 2008. “Per capita consumption in the US is still 10% lower than it would have been under the trend growth over the last 50 years.” And, “Eurozone per capita consumption is still just 1.6% above its pre-GFC level.”
  7. Politics. “the number of populist leaders has more than doubled since the early 2000s.”
  8. Safe middle-class jobs. “In 2007, more than half of Harvard graduates went to work in investment banking or management consulting.” And, “the national rate of company formation in America has fallen.”
  9. Housing is too expensive. “In 2018 the average price of a house increased by 4.4% across Europe, with Portugal and Ireland rising by 10.3% and 10.2%”
  10. Literary malaise. “By any other measure, the authors honored by the National Book Foundation over the past decade are a surprisingly homogenous group. Almost all of them are products of what has come to be known, among supporters and critics alike, as America’s “MFA Industrial Complex.” They all tend to matriculate at the same elite colleges, acquire advanced degrees in English or Creative Writing, and then go on to teach in the same circle of elite schools.”

I would also add some other, perhaps more observational evidence, such as newspapers’ inability to adapt to the internet, innovation in health and education is nowhere, the corporate cash pile, the inability to get Brexit done, the falling rate of IPO, the decline in poetry’s reading public, and the fact that advertising has become entirely stale. How often do you see an ad that actually earns its place in a prominent public space?

There is also the huge trend for retro and pre-loved items. Furniture from the 1970s, music from the 1980s, clothes from the 1990s. And let’s not forget the current interest in horoscopes.

It’s almost like we just can’t face up to the hard reality of a post-9/11, post-2008, post-internet world and aren’t going to accept the hard work that continuing to improve civilisation involves. We’ll be fine and keep chugging along for a while, but it’s no coincidence that politics has become so awful at the same time as the rest of these trends have emerged.

This is a deliberately pessimistic list, and it would be an interesting challenge to do one going the other way, but it isn’t easily ignored that we are producing less that is new and interesting. Why is it, for example, that despite persistent political problems we are still nowhere on solving the housing problem? Wouldn’t populism at least deliver more affordable housing? Are the property owners just not scared enough of Corbyn and Warren yet? Or are they simply decadent?

Most alarming is that I got this list using fairly ordinary things. We’re not even talking about space travel or theoretical physics.

Perhaps much of this is explained by the Alchian-Allen Theorem. There is so much to be gained by simply sitting at your screen and surfing, exploring the cultural niches of YouTube or learning Game Theory online or simply playing videos games. We haven’t yet realised that our minds are the new frontier. And therefore the returns to any sort of physical world accomplishments are much diminished.

As Tyler Cowen says, the benefit of things like YouTube comes from ‘high upfront “investment in context” costs’: we are fragmenting into more individualistic pleasures, which are less readily understood by the rest of us. Collective societal value, which used to be placed on the space race or whatever, is therefore displaced by smaller clusters of value. And all of this requires only a small flat, an internet connection and a device. It comes a lot cheaper than a space programme.

This may also explain why infrastructure seems to be less of a priority, and why housing is not as angry a political issue as it ought to be. People work from home more, they require transport less for their pleasures and when you have the world on a screen your home doesn’t need to be so big.

Maybe it isn’t decadence, maybe we’re all infovores now.

If that’s true there are two immediate possibilities for how we might end the decadence. First, we’ll start measuring value differently and realise we’re fine. Something will have to adjust in spending policy as we have an ageing population, but we will no longer see decadence as a threat to our future. Or, the equilibrium will shift once people realise that infrastructure and housing and productivity can only carry on like this for so long. Right now, the problem isn’t that bad, eventually something will snap and we’ll change our priorities.

In that second scenario, is it so unlikely that the introduction of AI and associated tech advances might actually start to bring us closer to a Jestsons-like future and that right now is a lull? It could be that culturally we have made the leap ahead to the next stage, but that our social and economic structures are yet to catch up. It’s going to be a sluggish decade or two until we get there, but after that we’ll be fine. Depending on the effect of robots on productivity, maybe the population decline will be less bad than expected.

After all, the Alchian-Allen Theorem relies on higher-priced goods as well as lower-priced ones. Eventually we’ll start measuring or producing the higher-priced goods properly again.

14 thoughts on “A list of ten ways we are decadent and a (speculative) theory about why it might not matter

  1. 1, 5, 6: one problem is that public sector/university science (including engineering science) has become a mass society phenomenon instead of a somewhat monastic career for enthusiasts and obsessives. In that transition much of it has become incompetent, dishonest, and corrupt. Moreover it has become bureaucratic, so that high spirited people of high intelligence presumably look for different careers. (I don’t know what those careers are.)

    2, 4 are presumably related. One of the greatest long term harms due to Hitler was to give the logic behind eugenics a bad name. (Mind you, eugenics as practised in, for example, the USA and Sweden also richly deserved a bad name because it often involved needless coercion.)

    3: If your sales are aimed at young, mass society, non-English speakers, what would you expect?

    7: rather an empty complaint if “populist” means “popular for reasons I disapprove of”, as it certainly seems to.

    8: God, who would try to build his own company in the face of endless harassment from governments? When a company is small how the hell is it meant to cope with the huge array of laws and regulations interfering with its running? It can’t afford “HR specialists”, corporate lawyers, and so on. To the new graduate putting up with corporate drivel might seem the lesser evil.

    It may also be that governments’ failures to impose sensible corporate governance laws play a part. Executives are nowadays allowed to loot and pillage corporations’ shareholders to a remarkable degree. Just look at their salaries, bonuses, share incentives, golden handcuffs, and golden parachutes.

    In fact, the playing field is so biased against small companies that you might almost wonder whether large corporations have far too much influence with politicians and civil servants. Money talks, conspicuously so in the US and EU. No doubt it talks more quietly in the UK but I can’t imagine it’s silent. HS2 indeed!

    9. Interest rates are too low.

    10. So what? Who cares? The literary world vanished up its own arse decades ago.

    ‘Something we have to adjust in spending policy as we have an ageing population’: ah, but maybe Dr Evil invented the Wuhan virus to deplete the world’s stock of wrinklies? Who says there’s no innovation now?


    1. 9. Higher interest rates would drive down housing prices but not mortgage payments or rent. Housing prices ceteris paribus are a proxy for mortgage payments and rent.


      1. There is indeed a relationship to rent but for many people housing prices are also the cost of an investment made in hopes of capital growth. Lower prices will encourage that even if the monthly mortgage payment has not reduced.

        Of course if interest rates start to rise the hopes of capital gains might prove in vain but it may take many years before people give up hope of making the sort of profits that the previous few generations thanks to falling interest rates.


  2. The beverages are much better now, especially the coffee and beer. And the water for most people is better, when filtered. We were all so thirsty back then, often had to go a full hour between drinks.

    Mainly, I no longer have to set my schedule around recording TV shows on the VCR. And organizing the tapes! What a time-saver! The tapes didn’t last, anyway.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.