Why is literary fiction so samey these days?

Most of the time contemporary English language ‘Literary Fiction’ is unappealing to me. Whenever I pick it up in the bookshop it all sounds the same. It feels more like reading a genre of fiction, than like reading the next stage of the weird, eclectic evolution of the novel.

And I think I’m more liable to enjoy novels by people who haven’t studied creative writing than by those who have. Margaret Atwood and Penelope Fitzgerald didn’t need Creative Writing MAs.

It seems there may be some truth to my prejudice, at least when measured by nominees and recipients of National Book Awards.

By any other measure, the authors honored by the National Book Foundation over the past decade are a surprisingly homogenous group. Almost all of them are products of what has come to be known, among supporters and critics alike, as America’s “MFA Industrial Complex.” They all tend to matriculate at the same elite colleges, acquire advanced degrees in English or Creative Writing, and then go on to teach in the same circle of elite schools.

In 2010, the National Book Award for Fiction went to Jaimy Gordon, who has a doctorate in Creative Writing from Brown University and has taught in the MFA program at Western Michigan University. She beat Lionel Shriver, who has an MFA from Columbia, Nicole Krauss, who has degrees from Stanford and Oxford, Karen Tei Yamashita, a professor of Literature at U.C. Santa Cruz, and Peter Carey, a member of the MFA faculty at Hunter College in New York.

I’m not sure elite education generally is the problem. The list of examples is compelling, and let’s not forget Dickens and Stoppard, but plenty of great English writers went to Oxbridge in the past. The real enemy of creativity is groupthink. It used to be that a writer was a reader who eventually produced their own book. These days, they are more likely to go on a course first. We won’t know for a long time how this works out, but so far Kazuo Ishiguro and Ian McEwan are the success stories. I suspect we are levelling up the level of mediocre and making it increasingly difficult for the publishing world to find the next genius. If she came along today, without any sort of Creative Writing MA, would Zadie Smith make it through the screening process?

5 thoughts on “Why is literary fiction so samey these days?

  1. I don’t read much fiction but.

    My wife recommended “Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine”. Highly enjoyable.

    There’s Hilary Mantel on Thom Cromwell: good stuff.

    About thirty years after everyone else I have just read Master and Commander. Hornblower plus.

    Like

  2. One of the reasons I like to read translations, to get out of that sameness, I recommend <a href="https://www.goodreads.com“>The Adventures of China Iron by Gabriela Cabezón Cámara. One of the most original works I’ve read this year, even if it does pay tribute to other works of literature I wasn’t aware of before reading it. Expanding literary horizons can be entertaining and fun.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.